USPTO serial 77357370
GMC SAW CAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GMC SAW CAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard R. Fine
HOWARD R. FINE HOWARD R. FINE, ATTORNEY AT LAW2100 SANDERS RD STE 200NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-6141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine and machine tools, power tools, namely, AC power operated drills, battery operated drills, drill bits, pile drivers, pile hammers, rotary hammers, AC power operated circular saws, AC power operated jigsaws, battery operated jigsaws, AC power operated mitre saws, AC power operated bench saws, AC power operated saws, battery operated saws, AC power operated sanders, AC power operated orbital sanders, battery operated orbital sanders, AC power operated belt sanders, AC power operated palm sanders, battery operated palm sanders, AC power operated sanders, battery operated sanders, AC power operated planers, battery operated planers, AC power operated polishers, AC power operated chainsaws, gasoline operated chainsaws, AC power operated angle grinders, battery operated grinders, AC power operated grinders, AC power operated routers, batter operated screwdrivers, AC power operated garden tools, namely, chippers, shredders, cultivators and lawn and garden edgers, gasoline operated garden tools, namely, chippers, shredders, cultivators and lawn and garden edgers; battery operated garden tools, namely, chippers, shredders, cultivators and lawn and garden edgers, AC power operated brush cutters, gasoline operated brush cutters, AC power operated grass cutters, gasoline powered grass cutters, battery powered grass cutters, AC powered lawn mowers, gasoline powered lawn mowers, battery operated lawn mowers, AC power operated hedge trimmers, battery operated hedge trimmers, AC power operated line trimmers, AC power operated trimmers, battery operated trimmers, AC power operated grass shears, AC power operated shears, battery operated shears, AC power operated vacuum/blowers, battery operated hand vacuums, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Video camera and display screen designed to allow the user of a hand tool or power tool to visually monitor the operation of the tool | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POWER BOX AG
- Other trademarks owned by POWER BOX AG
- Other trademarks owned by GMCA PTY Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GMC SAW CAM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |