USPTO serial 77358164
HISTABLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HISTABLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL N FL 3NAPLES, FL 34103-3590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals; chemical extracts and active principals extracted from medicinal plants for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals; and botanical extracts in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Herbal extracts sold as an integral ingredient in cosmetics; pre-moistened non-medicated personal hygiene wipes, namely, herpes relief wipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Food beverages, namely, dairy-based food beverages, fruit-based food beverages, vegetable-based food beverages, dairy-based chocolate food beverages. soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, vegetable-based chocolate food beverages and peanut-based food beverages; milk beverages, namely, milk, milk beverages containing fruits. milk beverages with high milk content, milk based beverages containing fruit juice and milk beverages containing coffee; milk powder; milk powder for nutritional purposes; powdered milk for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Herbal food beverages; food beverages, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, and grain-based food beverages; processed herbs; organic foods, namely, chocolate, dairy-free chocolate, reduced fat chocolate, reduced calorie chocolate, cocoa, chocolate chips, chocolate fondue, chocolate toppings, reduced fat candy, bakery products, namely, cookies, cakes, pies and muffins, crackers, biscuits, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, pretzels, chewing gum, frozen yogurt, frozen custard, fruit ices, pancake, waffle and bread mixes, salad dressing, pasta and pasta mixes, rice, cornmeal and wheat based snack foods; herbal infusions | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Organic beverages, namely, fruit drinks, soft drinks, drinking water and fruit and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Nutraceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HERBALSCIENCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HERBALSCIENCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HISTABLOC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |