USPTO serial 77358467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Monchengladbach, DE
Monchengladbach, DE
Monchengladbach, DE
DETTINGEN/ERMS, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brucker
William J. Brucker STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals used in industry for use in production, including in the manufacture of the following products: shrinkdown plastic tubing, roller coverings, corrugated tubes, lighting tube coverings, fibre-glass cloths, sweatbands, bags, fibre-glass conveyor belts, fibre-glass mesh fabrics, fibre-glass laminated plates, yarns, fabric articles, bellows, feed nozzles, welding and soldering wire of plastic, plastic liners, welding wire and welding film of plastic, gaskets, fluoro-plastic coatings, semi-finished goods of fluoro-plastics, including polytetrafluoroethylene, in the forms of plates, rods, pipes and foils; ] unprocessed plastics for use in for use in production, including in the manufacture of the following products: shrinkdown plastic tubing, roller coverings, corrugated tubes, lighting tube coverings, fibre-glass cloths, sweatbands, bags, fibre-glass conveyor belts, fibre-glass mesh fabrics, fibre-glass laminated plates, yarns, fabric articles, bellows, feed nozzles, welding and soldering wire of plastic, plastic liners, welding wire and welding film of plastic, gaskets, fluoro-plastic coatings, semi-finished goods of fluoro-plastics, including polytetrafluoroethylene, in the forms of plates, rods, pipes and foils | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Heat exchangers; hot plates; tubular radiators ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Plastics in extruded form for use in production, including in the manufacture of the following products: shrinkdown plastic tubing, roller coverings, corrugated tubes, lighting tube coverings, fibre-glass cloths, sweatbands, bags, fibre-glass conveyor belts, fibre-glass mesh fabrics, fibre-glass laminated plates, yarns, fabric articles, bellows, feed nozzles, welding and soldering wire of plastic, welding wire and welding film of plastic, plastic liners, gaskets, fluoro-plastic coatings, semi-finished goods of fluoro-plastics, including polytetrafluoroethylene, in the forms of plates, rods, pipes and foils | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |