USPTO serial 77358678
CHOOSE A BETTER WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOOSE A BETTER WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita M. Carrier
RITA M. CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5866UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried, canned, frozen, processed, and cooked fruits, vegetables, beans, and berries; jellies, jams, marmalades, and fruit preserves; eggs; egg substitutes; milk; milk-based beverages; soy milk; flavored milk; flavored syrups and flavored powders for use with milk; dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; cheese; cottage cheese; cream; half and half; non-dairy creamer; cream cheese; sour cream; yogurt; yogurt-based beverages; whipped topping; butter; butter substitutes; margarine; processed, roasted, and shelled nuts; fresh, frozen, processed, and canned fish, shrimp, and seafood; soups; bacon; garden salads; fruit salads; potato salads; dips; fresh, frozen, processed, and canned meat and meat products; pickles; processed olives; preserved, dried, and cooked olives; hot dogs; peanut butter; frozen, prepared, or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, or vegetables; refrigerated pizza and pastry dough; applesauce; cranberry sauce; vegetable oil; olive oil; protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars; breakfast bars, namely, fruit-based organic food bars; snack food, namely, fruit snacks and potato-based snacks; banana chips; fruit chips; potato chips; vegetable chips; processed edible seeds; fruit-based toppings; nut-based toppings; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits and processed nuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |