Drawing for ERI

USPTO serial 77359017

ERI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott R. Brown and Cheryl L. Burbach

Scott R. Brown and Cheryl L. Burbach Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publishing of test materials and test preparation materials, namely, books, magazines, and electronic publications; and education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of health occupationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 6, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 26, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 7, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 6, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance