USPTO serial 77359301
JUST FOR EXTENSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUST FOR EXTENSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Kelly
EDWARD P. KELLY TIAJOLOFF & KELLY405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | HAIR EXTENSIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |