USPTO serial 77359316
KIRI DANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3731970Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KIRI DANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Kanagawa-Ken, JP
Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Kanagawa-Ken, JP
Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Kanagawa-Ken, JP
Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID MIYOSHI
DAVID MIYOSHI MIYOSHI LAW1055 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1890LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nakamura Kigu Seisakujo Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named KIRI DANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |