USPTO serial 77359435
KEBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason K. Schmitz
Jason K. Schmitz Baker & McKenzie LLP130 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 3500`One Prudential PlazaChicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, charcuterie, fish, game, poultry cuts, seafood, shellfish not live, processed fruits, processed vegetables; cheese and meat-based spreads containing fat; cheese; eggs; butter, milk, yogurt, edible oils, edible fats; preserved potatoes, frozen potatoes, dried potatoes, cooked potatoes and prepared potatoes; fruit pulp | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; spices, condiments, namely, pepper sauce and ketchup; mustard; sauces; ice and ice preparations, namely, flavored ice; chocolate; confectionary, namely, pastilles, fudge, bakery products and candy, other than cookies; bread, bread rolls, pastry, other than cookies; yeast, baking-powder; coffee based beverages, cocoa-based beverages with milk, the aforesaid beverage goods being prepared beverages in the form of liquids of powder extracts that are sold in portioned packages; tea; filled bread and bread rolls, sandwiches; popcorn; honey; noodle products, namely, pasta noodles and noodles; pizza; processed herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic beverages with beer flavor; fruit drinks, fruit juices; mineral and aerated waters; syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinks; lemonades, fizzy lemonades, fruit nectars and soft drinks with added extracts containing cocoa, fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, fruit essences and fruit juice bases for making non-alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine excluding both sherry and manzanilla wines; sparkling wine; spirits and liqueurs; prepared alcoholic cocktails and aperitifs with a spirit and wine base | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business organization and management consultancy, development of marketing strategies, advertising agency services; franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Catering services for the providing of food and drink; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karmez Donerfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Karmez Donerfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named KEBOX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |