Drawing for COOLHAUS

USPTO serial 77360262

COOLHAUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOLHAUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Hopp and Matthew P. Ruhland

Fred Van Remortel The Hopp Law Firm,LLC999 18th StreetSuite 805Denver, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and business management consultancy; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Business administration consultancy; Business consulting service in the field of medical imaging centers; Business management and consultation; Employment counseling and recruiting; Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Human resources services, namely, personnel selection for others; Job and personnel placement; Management and business consulting services in the field of training and recruitment; Personnel placement and recruitmentABANDONED—
036Administration of employee benefit plans concerning insurance and financeABANDONED—
042Computer network design and computer software design for the employment recruitment field; Computer programming for others; Computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Research and development of computer software for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 30, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance