USPTO serial 77360365
GRAVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Pasulka
KATHLEEN A PASULKA PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B STREETSUITE 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Goods made of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastic, namely, picture frames, furniture fittings, bolsters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |