USPTO serial 77360903
ARBITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3605002Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARBITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent J. Handal, Jr.
VINCENT J. HANDAL, JR. SALON MARROW DYCKMAN NEWMAN & BROUDY LLP800 CORPORATE DR STE 208FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33334-3618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Recruiting, staffing and advertising services, namely, online recruitment advertising consultation, research, and agency services; recruiting and sourcing services, namely, providing a website featuring job postings, identifying potential job candidates by placing job postings on the internet and by performing internet searches for potential job candidates on behalf of third parties, compiling data on potential job candidates thus identified, compiling data on effectiveness of the advertising used to attract job candidates, the foregoing data used to review the effectiveness of job candidate recruitment efforts by analyzing the data collected and preparing reports about the data; recruitment advertising and personnel management consultation; advertising research, consultation, and management, namely, evaluating available advertising vendors and consulting on advertising strategies and alternatives that will increase candidate response and improve job candidates' attitudes toward potential employers; reporting and tracking of information and metrics regarding advertising, job postings, job candidates, applicants, and recruitment strategy effectiveness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2001 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for the management of recruiting, recruitment advertising, reports on job candidates and candidate and employee management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |