Drawing for BIOSPINE

USPTO serial 77361099

BIOSPINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOSPINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald J. Ehinger

RONALD J. EHINGER BARRETT & MCNAGNY LLP215 E BERRY STFORT WAYNE, IN 46802-2705UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Medical and scientific research in the field of medical devicesACTIVE—
045Licensing of intellectual property in the field of medical devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 7, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 7, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 7, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 11, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 21, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance