USPTO serial 77361245
HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Geriak
JAMES W. GERIAK Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP650 Town Center DriveFourth FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Reuben B. Klamer Living Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Reuben B. Klamer Living Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |