USPTO serial 77361961
KNOW ABUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KNOW ABUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest W. Grumbles III
ERNEST W. GRUMBLES III MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Non-profit educational services and curriculum, namely, classes, workshops and individual instruction in the field of violence prevention and distribution of course material in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |