Drawing for POSTGRESPLUS

USPTO serial 77362404

POSTGRESPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POSTGRESPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

Rosemary S. Tarlton Morrison & Foerster LLP1650 Tysons BoulevardSuite 400McLean, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for information processing, namely, database management and developmentACTIVE—
042Installation of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance