USPTO serial 77362862
HERCULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3930368Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HERCULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chantepie Cedex 35571, FR
Chantepie Cedex 35571, FR
LaGacilly Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. O'Brien
Sean D. O'Brien Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP111 S.W. Fifth AvenueSuite 3400PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (( Machines for recording, transmission or reproduction of )) [ images, namely, video cameras without microphone; Machines for recording, transmission or reproduction of ] (( sound and images, namely, chat devices being digital video recorders which include a video camera and a microphone; Webcams; )) Sound cards; Computer hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments or in network remediation or security; [ Peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments; ] universal serial bus (USB) hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments; Peripherals for portable media players; Headphones; Headsets for use with computers; (( Microphones; )) [ Audio electronic components, namely, surround sound electronics systems; ] Portable sound mixers; Audio circuit boards; Computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; Computer software for processing digital music files; Computer peripherals other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments and excluding computer keyboards, such computer peripherals for use with personal computers; Remote controls for computers; Computer software for editing images, sound, and/or video; Computer interface boards [ Machines for recording, transmission or reproduction of images, namely, video cameras without microphone; Machines for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images, namely, chat devices being digital video recorders which include a video camera and a microphone; Webcams; Sound cards; Computer hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments or in network remediation or security; Peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments; universal serial bus (USB) hardware other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments; Peripherals for portable media players; Headphones; Headsets for use with computers; Microphones; Audio electronic components, namely, surround sound electronics systems; Portable sound mixers; Audio circuit boards; Computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; Computer software for processing digital music files; Computer peripherals other than for use in nautical apparatus or instruments and excluding computer keyboards, such computer peripherals for use with personal computers; Remote controls for computers; Computer software for editing images, sound, and/or video; Computer interface boards ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guillemot Corporation, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Guillemot Corporation, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Guillemot Corporation, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HERCULES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 15, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |