USPTO serial 77363321
THE NORTH FACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE NORTH FACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trina A. Longo
CAROLINE C SMITH HOWREY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 22042-4522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Outerwear, namely, jackets, parkas, vests, coats, anoraks, one-piece shell suits, and rainwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |