USPTO serial 77364256
ORANGE CRÈME DE LA CRÈME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORANGE CRÈME DE LA CRÈME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd E. Stockwell
TODD E. STOCKWELL STOCKWELL & SMEDLEY, PSC861 CORPORATE DR STE 200LEXINGTON, KY 40503-5432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |