USPTO serial 77364356
IMAGE ID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGE ID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Lee, Jr.
William D. Lee, Jr. McNair Law Firm, P.A.P.O. Box 447Greenville, SC 29602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for comparing test strip profiles for human identification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |