Drawing for E-FUEL

USPTO serial 77366350

E-FUEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-FUEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trisha A. Dore

SUITE 702 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER; BRITISH COLUMB, V6B5A1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microprocessors, computer software, namely, mapping software, cellular phones, phones, electronic products and equipment, namely, global positioning (GPS) receiver/transmitterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 12, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 5, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance