USPTO serial 77367516
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy L. Zawaski
TRACY L. ZAWASKI RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products excluding cheeses, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit sauces, namely, applesauce and cranberry sauce, yoghurts; yoghurt products, namely, drinking yogurts and yogurt-based beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Cakes; desserts, namely, mousses, soufflés and puddings, and bakery desserts; confectionery, namely, pastilles, fruit jellies and fondants; sweets; biscuits; candy; chocolate; products made primarily from chocolate, namely, chocolate candies, chocolate topping, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; edible ices; ice cream; ice cream products, namely, ice cream sandwiches, ice cream cakes and ice cream drinks; frozen confectionery; cheese cake; fruit pies | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |