Drawing for ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL

USPTO serial 77367936

ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David O. Johanson, Esq.

DAVID O. JOHANSON, ESQ. BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP150 FEDERAL ST FL 15BOSTON, MA 02110-1726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Providing an on-line searchable database in the fields of building construction; Providing an on-line searchable database in the fields of building construction, maintenance and repair for searching and retrieving information from recommended building, construction, and safety codes, standards, regulations and rulesACTIVE—
042Providing an on-line searchable database in the fields of commercial and residential building design for searching and retrieving information from recommended building, construction and safety codes, standards, regulations and rules; providing a website that gives computer users the ability to subscribe to online publications permitting searches of recommended building, construction and safety codes, standards, regulations and rulesACTIVE—
045Providing an on-line searchable database of recommended laws and regulations in the fields of building codes and standards, construction codes and standards, and safety codes and standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 3, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 3, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 17, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 7, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance