Drawing for HERCULES

USPTO serial 77369325

HERCULES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERCULES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nikki Siesel, Joseph Messina

Nikki Siesel, Joseph Messina Law Offices of Joseph C. Messina424 Mamaroneck AvenueMamaroneck, NY 10543UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Disposable diapersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 10, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 8, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2009WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2009WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance