USPTO serial 77370042
MANWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Wahl
JAMES A. WAHL KRASS MONROE, P.A.8000 NORMAN CENTER DR STE 1000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55437-1177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's clothing, namely, coats, jackets, vests, sweaters, t-shirts, shirts, jerseys, shorts, parkas, pullovers, wind-jackets, pants, raincoats; sportswear, namely, sweatsuits, leisure suits, jeans, sport jackets, overalls; underwear, namely, short and long sleeve tee-shirts, long johns, briefs, boxers; Men's leather clothing, namely, coats, jackets, vests, shorts, parkas, pants, raincoats; Men's fashion accessories, namely, ties, socks, caps, gloves, belts, wristband, watch wristband, hats, shoes and scarves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |