Drawing for NAPHTIZIN

USPTO serial 77371772

NAPHTIZIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NAPHTIZIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Eliseeva

MARIA ELISEEVA HOUSTON ELISEEVA LLP4 MILITIA DRIVE, STE 4LEXINGTON, MA 02421-4705UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DecongestantsABANDONEDAug 31, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 26, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 8, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 8, 2008OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 28, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 23, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 22, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance