USPTO serial 77372260
ADQUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADQUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett M. Tolpin
BRETT M. TOLPIN Tolpin & Partners PC11 S. LaSalle SweetSuite 2900Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for behavioral and contextual targeting of media on the Internet, namely, software for use in targeting consumer groups according to their behavior traits and the content of the advertising; social media search and networking software, namely, computer search engine software for use in social networking; computer software to enable users to generate content, namely, blogs, podcasts and commentary; offering Internet based applications, namely, downloadable computer software for use in the following fields, namely, for use in behavioral and contextual targeting of media to specific consumer groups based on group characteristics, search engine software for use in business and social networking, and software for use in social media optimization, namely, optimizing advertising campaigns by targeting specific social groups | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Offering Internet based applications, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer software for use in the following fields, namely, for use in behavioral and contextual targeting of media to specific consumer groups based on group characteristics, search engine software for use in business and social networking, and software for use in social media optimization, namely, optimizing advertising campaigns by targeting specific social groups | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |