Drawing for SPEED LINE

USPTO serial 77372643

SPEED LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEED LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay M. Burgett

Jay M. Burgett NORVELL IP LLCPO Box 2461CHICAGO, IL 60690UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools and parts therefor, namely, saws, drills, screwdrivers, planers, sanders, grinders, grass and weed trimmers, polishers, routers, ratchet and impact wrenches, chisels, brush and glass cutters, and nail driving machines; cutting guides for guiding power sawsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 20, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 3, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2008GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance