USPTO serial 77372722
TRANSCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2011
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TRANSCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHATTANOOGA, TN
CHATTANOOGA, TN
CHATTANOOGA, TN
Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
Chattanooga, TN
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
Chattanooga, TN
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew D. Brownfield
Mathew D. Brownfield GRANT KONVALINKA & HARRISON PC633 CHESTNUT STREET, 9TH FLCHATTANOOGA, TN 37450-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically encoded cards, namely, debit cards, credit cards, prepaid telephone calling cards, prepaid cards, stored value cards, prepaid and controlled-spending cards for purchasing retail goods and services, gift cards, fuel cards, payroll cards, commission cards, rewards cards, frequent buyer and buyer loyalty incentive cards | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2007 |
| 036 | payment processing services, namely, credit card and prepaid card transaction processing; electronic funds transfer services and electronic payment services, namely, transaction processing and electronic processing of electronic funds transfer of debit card, credit card, gift card, prepaid card, controlled-spending card, stored value card, fuel card, payroll card, commission card, reward card and incentive card payments | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSCARD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSCARD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSCARD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named TRANSCARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |