USPTO serial 77373388
NEUROGENIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROGENIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa L. Heywood
Melissa L. Heywood Richards Buell Sutton LLP700 - 401 West Georgia StreetVancouver, BC, V6B5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing tutorials, seminars and workshops in the field of improving personal performance through cognitive training; Educational services, namely, providing tutorials, seminars and workshops in the field of improving personal fitness through cognitive training | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing physical and mental personal performance analysis and development consulting services, namely, Consulting services in the field of mental fitness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |