USPTO serial 77373832
CHEWKIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEWKIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | (Based on Intent to Use) Cookies; Croissants; Brownies(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Cookies; Croissants; Brownies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |