USPTO serial 77374766
ECOJOIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3684921Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOJOIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERKSHIRE SL4 3BL, GB
Ware, Hertfordshire, GB
Ware, Hertfordshire, GB
Ware, Hertfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
Bradley L. Cohn PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Structural building components made principally of both wood and metal, with metal being the predominant feature, namely, load-supporting columns; load-supporting beams made principally of both wood and metal, with metal being the predominant feature; metal roof trusses; joists and rafters made principally of both wood and metal, with metal being the predominant feature; floor joists of wood with metal spacer members, with metal being the predominant feature | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Computer software for designing and controlling the manufacture of structural building components | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Structural building components made principally of both wood and metal, with wood being the predominant feature, namely, load-supporting columns; load-supporting beams made principally of both wood and metal, with wood being the predominant feature; roof trusses, joists and rafters made principally of both wood and metal with wood being the predominant feature; floor joists of wood with metal spacer members, with wood being the predominant feature | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ITW LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Eleco plc
- Other trademarks owned by Eleco plc
- Other trademarks owned by Eleco plc
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ECOJOIST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |