Drawing for EDIBLE LOS ANGELES

USPTO serial 77374944

EDIBLE LOS ANGELES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3592620Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDIBLE LOS ANGELES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazines featuring tourism, culinary and agriculture industries and publications, namely, magazines and newsletters dealing with connecting consumers with local growers, food retailers, chefs and food artisansSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 15, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 26, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 5, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 20, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 19, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance