USPTO serial 77375906
BIEDERMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2014
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BIEDERMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
Donaueschingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
VS-Schwenningen, DE
BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH & CO. KG
VILLIGEN-SCHWENNINGEN, DE
VS-Schwenningen, DE
BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH & CO. KG
VILLIGEN-SCHWENNINGEN, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEDICAL USE FOR SKELETAL, SPINAL, JOINT AND TRAUMA SURGERY; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS, FOR BONES ALL MADE OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2008 |
| 042 | [ SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS IN PARTICULAR IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES AND DESIGN SERVICES RELATING THERETO; RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Motech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Motech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIEDERMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 16, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |