USPTO serial 77376384
PRESCRIBER'S PROOF A SELF-AUDIT SYSTEM AND DOCUMENTATION KIT FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRESCRIBER'S PROOF A SELF-AUDIT SYSTEM AND DOCUMENTATION KIT FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lenoir City, TN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information; Downloadable audio files, multimedia files, text files, emails, written documents, audio material, video material and games featuring information in the form of downloadable short educational/training communications in the field of human resource development for the promotion of employee retention, career growth and increased productivity for employees and employers; Computer programmes for document management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Interactive record-keeping services for use in risk management and regulatory compliance by insurers and professionals in the medical field | ACTIVE | May 1, 2007 |
| 045 | Reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with controlled substance and pain management laws and regulations | ACTIVE | May 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bolen, Jennifer E
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PRESCRIBER'S PROOF A SELF-AUDIT SYSTEM AND DOCUMENTATION KIT FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |