Drawing for DUOMAX HC520

USPTO serial 77378569

DUOMAX HC520

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUOMAX HC520?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plant growth regulator for breaking dormancy of grapes, apples, blueberries, cherries, kiwis and peachesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Aug 12, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jul 10, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 3, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 18, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 29, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jan 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance