USPTO serial 77380007
SKY CASINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKY CASINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Hervey
SCOTT HERVEY WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK400 CAPITOL MALL FL 11SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4434UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Casino services, excluding casino services provided in airports or on airplanes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |