USPTO serial 77380092
FT SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4024350Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FT SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Flint Transfield Services Limited
Calgary, CA
Flint Transfield Services Limited
Calgary, CA
Flint Transfield Services Limited
Calgary, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Schneck
THOMAS SCHNECK SCHNECK & SCHNECKPO BOX 2ESAN JOSE, CA 95109-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management services for the energy industry, namely, business management services, consulting services for the energy industry, namely, business management consulting, business planning services for the energy industry; business management services for the energy industry, namely, business project management services; management of plants for others in the energy industry; business services for the energy industry, namely, facilities management of technical operations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of property, buildings, plant facilities and equipment for the energy industry; janitorial services for the energy industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flint Transfield Services Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Flint Transfield Services Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Flint Transfield Services Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named FT SERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |