Drawing for REACHNET

USPTO serial 77382091

REACHNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REACHNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Slafsky

John L. Slafsky WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009fire alarmsACTIVE—
042computer consulting services in the field of building and property securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2009UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance