Drawing for TOTAL SHELTER NETWORK

USPTO serial 77382183

TOTAL SHELTER NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL SHELTER NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing and advertising services, namely, providing marketing and advertising services to home design and decoration websitesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 31, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 26, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 19, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 10, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 18, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 9, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 3, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 3, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 3, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 4, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 4, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance