USPTO serial 77384526
INTERTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Implementation of quality management systems; implementation of environmental management systems; implementation of occupational health and safety management systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |