USPTO serial 77385306
IFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
86641 Rain am Lech, DE
Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
RAIN AM LECH, DE
IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
86641 Rain am Lech, DE
Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
86641 Rain am Lech, DE
Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STORAGE TANKS, NAMELY, METAL FLUID STORAGE TANKS AND METAL STORAGE TANKS AND ROOFS THEREFORE; CONTAINERS, FLOATING CONTAINERS, SILOS, AND STORAGE TANKS MADE OF METAL FOR LIQUID FUEL | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 007 | MACHINES FOR PROCESSING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR DOSING, MIXING, HOMOGENIZING, DISPERSING, GRINDING, CONVEYING, FILLING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; DOSING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, HOPPERS, FEEDERS, DISCHARGERS AND CONDUITS FOR CONTROLLABLY FEEDING AND DISCHARGING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, MIXER MACHINES, HOMOGENIZER MACHINES, DISPERSER MACHINES, NAMELY, KNEADERS, BALL MILLS, GRINDER MACHINES, CONVEYER MACHINES; REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR MIXER MACHINES, HOMOGENIZER MACHINES, DISPERSER MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES, CONVEYING MACHINES; SACK FEEDING STATIONS, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR FEEDING MATERIALS OUT OF SACKS, BIG BAGS, OCTABIN LINER, CARDBOARD BOXES AND CONTAINERS; SACK SEWING MACHINES AND PACKING MACHINES AS WELL AS TINTING MACHINES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COLORS AND LACQUERS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, METERING SENSOR ELEMENTS FOR MEASURING WEIGHT, FLOW RATES, AIR PRESSURE, TEMPERATURE, AND FILLING LEVELS OF RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING OF METERING SENSOR ELEMENTS FOR MEASURING WEIGHT, FLOW RATES, AIR PRESSURE, TEMPERATURE, AND FILLING LEVELS OF RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE IN STORAGE TANKS, CONTAINERS, FLOATING CONTAINERS, SILOS AND FOR CONTROLLING THE ADDITION AND THE DISCHARGE OF PRE-DETERMINED DOSAGES OF LIQUID AND SOLID RAW MATERIALS TO INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES; DOSING APPARATUSES, NAMELY, FOR DISPENSING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; SCALES FOR WEIGHING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID RAW MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE USED TOGETHER WITH MACHINES FOR, DOSING, MIXING, HOMOGENIZING, DISPERSING, GRINDING, CONVEYING, FILLING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 020 | (Based on 44(e)) STORAGE TANKS, CONTAINERS, FLOATING CONTAINERS, AND CONTAINERS, FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL USE, NAMELY, FOR LIQUID FUEL TOO, NEITHER MADE OF METAL NOR OF MASONRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE OF MACHINES, DEVICES AND SYSTEMS AND LINES, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR, DOSING, MIXING, HOMOGENIZING, DISPERSING, GRINDING, CONVEYING, FILLING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTING, TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY IN MACHINES FOR, DOSING, MIXING, HOMOGENIZING, DISPERSING, GRINDING, CONVEYING, FILLING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS CONTROL COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; TECHNICAL DESIGN FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, TECHNICAL DESIGN OF MACHINES FOR, DOSING, MIXING, HOMOGENIZING, DISPERSING, GRINDING, CONVEYING, FILLING RAW LIQUID AND SOLID MATERIALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by IFA TECHNOLOGY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by IFA Industrielle Wiegetechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IFA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 14, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |