USPTO serial 77385853
EZ-LOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ-LOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. Sheehan, Esq
Gregory P. Sheehan Gregory P. Sheehan, P.C.88 Sandwich StreetPlymouth, MA 02360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Anchors | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |