USPTO serial 77386061
EXTENSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXTENSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. MULCAHY
2881 Scott Blvd.M/S 2061Santa Clara, CA 95054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EQUIPMENT AND MACHINES FOR THE PROCESSING AND MANUFACTURING OF SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES, THIN FILMS, SILICON DISCS AND SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS INCLUDING EQUIPMENT AND MACHINES FOR POLISHING, CLEANING AND PROCESS MONITORING OF THE PRODUCTION OF SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES, THIN FILMS, SILICON DISCS AND SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |