USPTO serial 77386378
IN THE BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IN THE BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Moses
THOMAS L. MOSES MONAHAN & MOSES, LLC13B W WASHINGTON STGREENVILLE, SC 29601-2734UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Coin purses; Handbags, purses and wallets; Purses; Purses and wallets; Diaper bags | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 2008 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring purses, handbags, coin purses, diaper bags, wallets and women's accessories; On-line retail store services featuring purses, handbags, coin purses, diaper bags, wallets and women's accessories | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |