CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MDESKING

USPTO serial 77387043

MDESKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MDESKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William S. Nabors

WILLIAM S. NABORS HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLP1 GOJO PLZ STE 300AKRON, OH 44311-1076UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, providing commercial information and business advice via the Internet regarding the sale and lease of vehicles; business evaluation services, namely, processing and analysis of commercial data via the Internet and consulting related to the sale of vehiclesACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, providing financial information via the Internet regarding the sale and lease of vehicles; processing and analysis of financial data via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance