USPTO serial 77388268
Serial No. 77388268
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77388268?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
Roberta S. Bren MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Briefcases; attaché cases; clutches; handbags; purses; satchels; toiletry cases sold empty; suit bags; garment bags for travel; coin purses; drawstring pouches; wallets; billfolds; key cases; umbrellas; business card cases; cosmetic cases sold empty; vanity cases sold empty; leather pouches; felt pouches; credit card cases; business card cases; calling card cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |