USPTO serial 77388564
MC MACROCOMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MC MACROCOMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
Lerma,Estado de Mexico, MX
Other trademarks owned by CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
Lerma,Estado de Mexico, MX
Other trademarks owned by CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Abrams
DAVID S. ABRAMS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P.1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer alloy compositions used as raw materials for molding | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Automotive parts, namely, engine and transmission seals | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Injection and blow molded structural parts for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Nanocomposite polymer compounds in pellet form for use as raw materials in further manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CID Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named MC MACROCOMP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |