USPTO serial 77389440
RTIMDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RTIMDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rockville Centre, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Speciale
RAYMOND C. SPECIALE RAYMOND C. SPECIALE, ESQ., P.C.3617 BYRON CIRFREDERICK, MD 21704-7811UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICES PROVIDER FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN TRACKING, DOCUMENTING, MONITORING AND MANAGING ACADEMIC INTERVENTION SERVICES AND RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION MODELS FOR SCHOOLS SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES; APPLICATION SERVICES PROVIDER, NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ACADEMIC INTERVENTION SERVICES AND RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION MODELS FOR SCHOOLS SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |