USPTO serial 77390994
JBT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2013
- Examiner
- KOZAK, EVIN L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with JBT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHICAGO, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Houston, TX, US
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHICAGO, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHICAGO, IL, US
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHICAGO, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Nowak
Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED MOVABLE PASSENGER BRIDGES FOR CONNECTING AN AIRPORT GATE TO AN AIRCRAFT; GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CARGO LOADING MACHINES; MILITARY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CARGO LOADING MACHINES; GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, POWER OPERATED APPARATUS, NAMELY, DEICERS, WHICH USE FORCED AIR TO REMOVE ICE AND SNOW FROM AIRCRAFT; PEELING MACHINES FOR PEELING FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; MACHINERY FOR USE IN SCREENING PULP; FILTERS FOR FLOW CONTROL FOR FOOD PROCESSING MACHINES; ASEPTIC ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS; ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS; CUTTING MACHINES, NAMELY, PORTIONERS; VIBRATORY SCREEN SEPARATORS; MACHINES FOR USE IN MIXING, BLENDING, EXTRACTING, CANNING, HANDLING, CONVEYING, DISTRIBUTING, STORING, BULK HANDLING, DUMPING, LIFTING, FEEDING, SORTING, SCREENING, FILTERING, SIZING, GRADING, SOIL REMOVING, CHOPPING, CUTTING, PORTIONING, WATER JET CUTTING, WASHING, COATING, DUSTING, PACKAGING, FILLING, CONTAINERIZING, DEFATTING, FINISHING, JUICING, DESTONING, PEELING, PULPING, CONCENTRATING, DIPPING, FORMING, ENZYME DEACTIVATING, DEAERATING, AND SEASONING OF FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS, DAIRY PRODUCTS, MEATS, SEAFOODS, BEVERAGES, FOODSTUFFS AND FOOD PRODUCTS; REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 011 | AIRPORT GATE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AND ELECTRIC HEATERS FOR USE IN COOLING AND HEATING AIRCRAFT BOARDING BRIDGES AND AIRCRAFT PARKED IN AIRPORTS; MILITARY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, AIR CONDITIONING UNITS FOR USE IN COOLING MILITARY AIRCRAFT; FOOD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FOOD DRYERS, AIR COOLING APPARATUS, REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE CHILLING UNITS, FREEZERS, INDUSTRIAL DEEP FRYERS, HEATING ELEMENTS, INDUSTRIAL COOKING OVENS, ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMERS, INDUSTRIAL COOKING OVENS FOR BLANCHING, GAS AND ELECTRIC GRILLS FOR SEARING, COMMERCIAL COOKING OVENS, FOOD DRYERS FOR USE IN PRESERVING FOODS, STERILIZERS, NAMELY, AUTOCLAVERS, STERILIZERS, PASTEURIZERS, EVAPORATORS, AND EVAPORATORS FOR DE-WATERING, FOR USE WITH FRUITS, VEGETABLES, DAIRY PRODUCTS, MEATS, SEAFOODS, POULTRY, BEVERAGES, FOODSTUFFS AND FOOD PRODUCTS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS; PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FOOD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL APPARATUS, IN THE NATURE OF FOOD DRYERS, AIR COOLING APPARATUS, REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FOOD AND BEVERAGE CHILLING UNITS, FREEZERS, INDUSTRIAL DEEP FRYERS, HEATING ELEMENTS, INDUSTRIAL COOKING OVENS, ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMERS, GAS AND ELECTRIC GRILLS FOR SEARING, COMMERCIAL COOKING OVENS, STERILIZERS, NAMELY, AUTOCLAVERS, STERILIZERS, PASTEURIZERS, EVAPORATORS AND EVAPORATORS FOR DE-WATERING, FOR USE WITH FRUITS, VEGETABLES, DAIRY PRODUCTS, MEATS, SEAFOODS, POULTRY, BEVERAGES, FOODSTUFFS AND FOOD PRODUCTS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE OF AIRPORT AND AIR CARGO BUILDINGS, AIRPORT COMPUTER HARDWARE SYSTEMS, AND GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CARGO LOADING MACHINES AND POWER OPERATED APPARATUS, NAMELY, DEICERS, WHICH USE FORCED AIR TO REMOVE ICE AND SNOW FROM AIRCRAFT | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 040 | Food processing; consulting services in the field of food processing and handling | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software consultation services relating to computer hardware and software used in the food processing industry; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems relating to computer software and hardware used in the food processing industry; maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FMC Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by JBT MAREL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JBT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |