USPTO serial 77391275
HELIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly B. Markley
MOLLY B. MARKLEY YOUNG, BASILE, HANLON, MACFARLANE & HELMHOLDT, P.C3001 W. BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY, DRINKING WATER; SOFT DRINKS; SMOOTHIES; ENERGY DRINKS; SPORTS DRINKS; FRUIT DRINKS; ISOTONIC DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |